<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can a one party system be called a democracy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.isallaboutmath.com/2009/03/02/can-a-one-party-system-be-called-a-democracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.isallaboutmath.com/2009/03/02/can-a-one-party-system-be-called-a-democracy/</link>
	<description>illuminating your mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:46:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oloka-obbo</title>
		<link>http://blog.isallaboutmath.com/2009/03/02/can-a-one-party-system-be-called-a-democracy/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>oloka-obbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isallaboutmath.com/?p=275#comment-723</guid>
		<description>what l want to know is that,cant different idealogies be merged in the one party system of governance? for l think and that different idealogies can be thought of but the best one chosen for governance. people opt for multiparty because of greed for power and massing wealth. there would be no dictatorship or clinging to power by some leaders in miltiparty system. arent people supressed in the multiparty system? l believe democracy can be traced in one party system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what l want to know is that,cant different idealogies be merged in the one party system of governance? for l think and that different idealogies can be thought of but the best one chosen for governance. people opt for multiparty because of greed for power and massing wealth. there would be no dictatorship or clinging to power by some leaders in miltiparty system. arent people supressed in the multiparty system? l believe democracy can be traced in one party system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isallaboutmath</title>
		<link>http://blog.isallaboutmath.com/2009/03/02/can-a-one-party-system-be-called-a-democracy/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>isallaboutmath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isallaboutmath.com/?p=275#comment-506</guid>
		<description>Tega

I agree there is multiple ways of giving power to the people.

But when a system repress any other dissenting point of view and people are place in prison or even executed for having different solutions to problems in society than the ones impose by a government it makes it impossible for me to call that a democracy. A one party system is a sure road to this 
state of affairs.

I have experience both system and there is a big difference with regards to freedom on both therefore that is why I do like better the western style of democracy where each can have different solutions or opinions about each problem and not the &quot;Cuban style democracy&quot;.  In all honesty we should not called democracy since what gets done in a system like that is what the top hierarchy of the communist party wants. That is the ruling class and nobody
 else have a say in that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tega</p>
<p>I agree there is multiple ways of giving power to the people.</p>
<p>But when a system repress any other dissenting point of view and people are place in prison or even executed for having different solutions to problems in society than the ones impose by a government it makes it impossible for me to call that a democracy. A one party system is a sure road to this<br />
state of affairs.</p>
<p>I have experience both system and there is a big difference with regards to freedom on both therefore that is why I do like better the western style of democracy where each can have different solutions or opinions about each problem and not the &#8220;Cuban style democracy&#8221;.  In all honesty we should not called democracy since what gets done in a system like that is what the top hierarchy of the communist party wants. That is the ruling class and nobody<br />
 else have a say in that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tega</title>
		<link>http://blog.isallaboutmath.com/2009/03/02/can-a-one-party-system-be-called-a-democracy/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Tega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 22:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isallaboutmath.com/?p=275#comment-495</guid>
		<description>must democracy  be of western standards and values? the American took Montesque recommedation of democracy, as you know the french adopted a diffrent ideology, and yes the British are diffrent. here I ask again if  the Americans and the Brits had practiced one party system in the past hundred years would you be complaining or attacking one party system.

Further I believe one party system can provide strong and good democratic governance with time, howevr those countries that  has been unsuccessful in the pratice of one party system are just emerging from extreme communism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>must democracy  be of western standards and values? the American took Montesque recommedation of democracy, as you know the french adopted a diffrent ideology, and yes the British are diffrent. here I ask again if  the Americans and the Brits had practiced one party system in the past hundred years would you be complaining or attacking one party system.</p>
<p>Further I believe one party system can provide strong and good democratic governance with time, howevr those countries that  has been unsuccessful in the pratice of one party system are just emerging from extreme communism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
