http://blog.isallaboutmath.com/2008/01/19/producing-animations-with-mathematica-60-is-as-easy-as-pie/ illuminating your mind Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:56:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU hourly 1 http://blog.isallaboutmath.com/2008/01/19/producing-animations-with-mathematica-60-is-as-easy-as-pie/#comment-36 pilfer Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:58:16 +0000 http://blog.isallaboutmath.com/2008/01/19/producing-animations-with-mathematica-60-is-as-easy-as-pie/#comment-36 I'm pretty sure you could do a nice jug animation in Mathematica too. 3D objects from CAD data or 3D scanner data can be rendered with reflection and transparency now and animated in 3D. I’m pretty sure you could do a nice jug animation in Mathematica too. 3D objects from CAD data or 3D scanner data can be rendered with reflection and transparency now and animated in 3D.

]]> http://blog.isallaboutmath.com/2008/01/19/producing-animations-with-mathematica-60-is-as-easy-as-pie/#comment-31 the7new7ramanujan Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:39:04 +0000 http://blog.isallaboutmath.com/2008/01/19/producing-animations-with-mathematica-60-is-as-easy-as-pie/#comment-31 um, one small clarification, ... not all kinds of animations, just those based mathematical graphs, else ... i'm afraid mathematica falls short, like the simulation of a generalization of the three jug problem. um, one small clarification, … not all kinds of animations, just those based mathematical graphs, else … i’m afraid mathematica falls short, like the simulation of a generalization of the three jug problem.

]]>